In the Missouri/Mississippi River System

The Missouri/Mississippi river system currently exhibits mixed water availability conditions, with the Mississippi River maintaining near-normal flow levels at approximately 99% of seasonal averages, while the Missouri River faces significant stress with flows at only 50% of normal levels312. This disparity reflects complex regional variations in precipitation patterns, drought conditions, and water management challenges across the vast watershed that drains approximately 41% of the continental United States2. The system's water availability is further complicated by aging infrastructure receiving poor treatment violation grades and declining long-term reservoir storage trends, particularly in western regions where irrigation demands compete with other water uses59.

System Overview and Geographic Context

The Missouri/Mississippi river system represents the backbone of North American inland waterways, with the Missouri River serving as the continent's longest river at 2,341 miles before joining the Mississippi River north of St. Louis113. The Missouri River originates in the Rocky Mountains of southwestern Montana and flows eastward across the Great Plains, one of the driest regions of North America, before traversing Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri1. This extensive drainage network encompasses a semi-arid watershed exceeding 500,000 square miles, including portions of ten U.S. states and two Canadian provinces13.

The Mississippi River itself, while shorter than the Missouri at 2,320 miles, carries substantially more water and serves as the primary outlet for the combined system4. When considering average discharge rates, the Mississippi River at its mouth delivers approximately 593,000 cubic feet per second, making it the highest-discharge river in the United States4. The Missouri River, despite its greater length, contributes an average of 86,300 cubic feet per second to this total flow4. The system's major tributaries include the Arkansas, Illinois, Ohio, and Red rivers, with the Ohio River alone contributing 281,500 cubic feet per second, significantly exceeding the Missouri's contribution24.

The river system's commercial importance cannot be overstated, as it carries 60% of U.S. grain shipments, 22% of oil and gas shipments, and 20% of coal transport2. This economic dependency on the waterway makes water availability assessment critical for both transportation infrastructure and regional economic stability. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers maintains the navigation system with project depths of 9-12 feet to accommodate barge transportation of bulk commodities2.

Current Water Conditions and Flow Data

Recent measurements reveal concerning disparities in water availability across the Missouri/Mississippi system. The Mississippi River demonstrates relatively stable conditions with total streamflow measured at 3,383,619 cubic feet per second as of June 1, 2025, representing approximately 99.4% of normal seasonal flow12. This near-normal condition reflects the river's more humid eastern drainage basin and its substantial contribution from major tributaries like the Ohio River. Maximum discharge along the Mississippi currently occurs at Vicksburg, Mississippi, with flows reaching 1,040,000 cubic feet per second12.

In stark contrast, the Missouri River exhibits significantly stressed conditions with total streamflow of only 726,070 cubic feet per second, representing just 49.89% of normal seasonal averages3. The seasonal average for this time of year typically measures 1,455,441 cubic feet per second, indicating a deficit of over 700,000 cubic feet per second3. This dramatic reduction in flow volume has prompted warnings that river levels are low enough to signify drought conditions throughout much of the Missouri River basin3.

The spatial distribution of these flow deficits varies considerably along the Missouri River's course. At the headwaters near Toston, Montana, flows measure 9,870 cubic feet per second, while the river gradually increases to 93,600 cubic feet per second at Hermann, Missouri, near its confluence with the Mississippi3. However, even these downstream measurements represent significant reductions from historical norms, with many monitoring stations reporting 24-hour flow decreases ranging from 1% to nearly 7%3. The highest gauge stage currently occurs at Decatur, Nebraska, with water levels reaching 21.18 feet, though this still reflects below-normal conditions3.

Drought Conditions and Regional Assessment

Drought conditions across the Missouri/Mississippi watershed present a complex mosaic of severity levels and regional variations. Mississippi state shows relatively favorable conditions with 83.96% of the state classified as "not dry" and only 16.04% experiencing abnormally dry conditions14. No areas of Mississippi currently face moderate, severe, extreme, or exceptional drought classifications14. This favorable status in the lower Mississippi Valley aligns with recent reports indicating that the Lower Mississippi Valley and Tennessee Valley regions remain drought-free with surplus precipitation over the past 30 to 90 days6.

However, drought conditions intensify significantly in the upper reaches of the system, particularly affecting the Missouri River basin. The Missouri Basin received a grade of D for water supply, reflecting widespread challenges in maintaining adequate water availability5. Recent drought monitor data indicates expanding short-term drought conditions across portions of southwestern Iowa, northern Illinois, and northwestern Indiana6. These expanding drought conditions directly impact tributary flows feeding into both the Missouri and upper Mississippi river systems.

The Pacific Northwest and western mountain regions, which supply headwater flows to the Missouri River, face intensifying drought conditions. Short-term drought has expanded across the Pacific Northwest while intensifying in southern Utah and northwestern Colorado during mid to late May 20256. These upstream drought conditions directly translate to reduced snowpack and diminished spring runoff, contributing to the Missouri River's current 50% of normal flow conditions3. The situation represents a continuation of long-term water stress affecting western watersheds that feed the Missouri River system.

Missouri state's drought declaration status remains inactive, with no current drought declarations in effect7. However, state authorities continue regular monitoring through the Climate and Weather Committee, acknowledging the potential for rapidly changing conditions7. The state encourages public participation in drought condition reporting through the Condition Monitoring Observer Reports (CMOR) system, which provides essential ground-truth data for drought assessment and response planning7.

Seasonal Patterns and Operational Characteristics

The Missouri/Mississippi river system exhibits distinct seasonal patterns that reflect regional climatic differences and water management strategies. Eastern portions of the watershed, dominated by flood control infrastructure, typically maintain peak storage during winter months with sharper operational range decreases during summer periods9. This pattern reflects the humid climate of the eastern United States where spring precipitation and snowmelt provide substantial water inputs, while summer evapotranspiration and irrigation withdrawals reduce available flows.

Western portions of the watershed, where the Missouri River originates, follow dramatically different seasonal patterns more suited to arid irrigation-dependent regions. These areas typically experience peak storage during spring and summer months, with increased operational ranges during summer periods when irrigation demands peak9. The Missouri River's headwaters in Montana and the Dakotas rely heavily on spring snowmelt from the Rocky Mountains, making the system particularly vulnerable to reduced snowpack and earlier melting patterns associated with climate variability.

Reservoir operations across the Missouri River mainstem system reflect these seasonal demands through carefully managed release schedules. The six major Missouri River mainstem reservoirs - Fort Peck, Garrison, Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavins Point - collectively held 50,253 thousand acre-feet of water as of December 2024, representing 91% of the 1967-2023 average8. However, this total reflects a decrease of 152 thousand acre-feet from the previous month, indicating ongoing storage challenges8.

Individual reservoir conditions vary significantly, with Fort Randall showing the most concerning status at only 70% of average storage capacity8. Garrison and Fort Peck reservoirs maintain closer to normal levels at 96% and 92% of average respectively, while Oahe operates at 88% of normal capacity8. These storage differentials reflect varying watershed conditions and operational priorities, with upstream reservoirs in Montana and North Dakota facing greater stress from reduced inflows.

The seasonal flow variability becomes particularly pronounced during spring flood periods. Historical data shows that during major flood events, Missouri River flows can exceed 3.5 million cubic feet per second, as observed in 20193. Such extreme events can fill substantial water bodies remarkably quickly - during peak flows, the Missouri River near Omaha can theoretically fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool in approximately half a second17. However, the current flow deficit means such dramatic water movement capacity is severely diminished, affecting both flood control and navigation capabilities.

Long-term Trends and Storage Challenges

Historical analysis reveals troubling long-term trends in reservoir storage across the Missouri/Mississippi watershed, with national reservoir storage declining by at least 10% over the past thirty years9. These declining trends particularly affect arid and semi-arid regions such as the Missouri River basin, where storage challenges directly impact water availability for irrigation, municipal supplies, and ecosystem maintenance. The southwestern United States and southeastern humid regions have experienced the largest storage declines compared to other areas of the continental United States9.

The Missouri River basin faces particular vulnerability due to its geographic position spanning both humid eastern regions and arid western areas. Research indicates that semi-arid basins with higher storage levels experience more dramatic drawdowns during drought periods compared to humid regions where flood control remains the dominant reservoir purpose9. This pattern explains why Missouri River reservoirs show more significant storage reductions during dry periods, while Mississippi River system reservoirs in humid regions maintain more stable levels.

Decreasing storage trends correlate directly with declining reservoir resilience, particularly affecting southwestern regions and the Mississippi basin where reservoir storage struggles to recover following recent drought events9. The Colorado River system, which shares similar arid characteristics with upper Missouri River tributaries, demonstrates how extended drought conditions can create persistent storage deficits. The Missouri River system faces similar risks as drought conditions expand across its western watershed.

Climate change projections suggest these trends will likely intensify, with expectations of below-average runoff and reservoir storage for the Missouri River mainstem system extending into 20258. Historical precedent from recent megadroughts affecting the western United States provides concerning parallels for Missouri River water availability. The current storage levels of 91% of normal across Missouri River mainstem reservoirs, combined with ongoing inflow deficits, suggest continued challenges for water availability throughout the system8.

Long-term infrastructure challenges compound these natural storage declines. The Missouri River system includes fifteen major dams on the main stem with hundreds more on tributaries, representing massive investments in water control infrastructure13. However, this extensive development has reduced the river's natural length by almost 200 miles through channelization and meander cuts designed to improve navigation13. While these modifications enhance transportation efficiency, they also reduce the system's natural water storage capacity and resilience during drought periods.

Water Supply Assessment and Management

The overall Mississippi Watershed received a grade of C- for water supply, reflecting systemic challenges in maintaining adequate water quality and quantity across the vast drainage basin5. This below-average grade stems from poor performance across multiple indicators, including water depletion (grade B-) and treatment violations (grade D), revealing that municipal water systems perform inadequately throughout much of the watershed5. The Missouri Basin specifically received a grade of D for water supply, indicating more severe challenges in the western portions of the system where arid conditions and competing demands stress available resources5.

Treatment violations represent a particularly concerning aspect of water supply challenges across the watershed. The overall watershed received a D grade for treatment violations, suggesting widespread problems with municipal water treatment infrastructure5. The Upper Mississippi Basin performed best among the five major sub-basins with a C grade for treatment violations, while other basins scored lower5. These infrastructure challenges compound natural water availability issues, as inadequate treatment capacity can limit usable water supplies even when raw water sources remain available.

Water depletion indicators across the watershed paint a mixed picture of resource stress. The overall watershed scored B- for water depletion, with the Upper Mississippi Basin achieving the highest grade of B5. This relatively better performance in northern regions reflects the more humid climate and greater precipitation reliability compared to western areas. However, the Missouri Basin's D grade for water supply suggests that depletion rates exceed sustainable levels in much of the Missouri River drainage area.

Municipal water supply infrastructure faces increasing pressure from growing populations and expanding agricultural demands throughout the watershed. The Mississippi River system's role in supporting 60% of U.S. grain shipments requires substantial water withdrawals for irrigation, while urban areas along the river corridors demand increasing municipal supplies2. These competing demands, combined with aging treatment infrastructure, create complex water management challenges that extend beyond simple availability questions to encompass allocation priorities and system efficiency.

The integrated management approach necessary for addressing these challenges requires coordination across multiple states, federal agencies, and water user groups. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers maintains navigation infrastructure, while various state agencies manage water allocation and quality standards2. This complex governance structure complicates efforts to address watershed-wide water availability issues, particularly during drought periods when competing demands intensify and coordination becomes most critical.

Conclusion

Water availability in the Missouri/Mississippi river system reflects a complex interplay of natural variability, infrastructure constraints, and management challenges that vary dramatically across the vast watershed. While the Mississippi River maintains near-normal flow conditions at 99% of seasonal averages, the Missouri River's severely stressed condition at only 50% of normal flow demonstrates the system's vulnerability to drought and climatic variability312. This disparity highlights how regional differences in precipitation, snowpack, and water management practices create uneven water availability across the interconnected system.

The system's long-term trends suggest intensifying challenges, with reservoir storage declining by at least 10% nationally over recent decades and the Missouri Basin receiving particularly poor grades for water supply management59. Current drought conditions expanding across western tributary areas, combined with below-average reservoir storage expectations extending into 2025, indicate that water availability stress will likely persist68. The Missouri River's current storage levels at 91% of normal, coupled with ongoing inflow deficits, suggest continued water availability challenges throughout the western portions of the watershed.

Future water availability depends critically on improved integrated management approaches that balance competing demands while maintaining system resilience during drought periods. The system's economic importance, carrying 60% of U.S. grain shipments and substantial energy resources, makes water availability a national concern extending beyond regional interests2. Addressing infrastructure challenges, improving treatment system performance, and developing adaptive management strategies will be essential for maintaining reliable water supplies in this vital river system as climatic variability and demand pressures continue to intensify.

Citations:

Answer from Perplexity: pplx.ai/share

Alberta West News

Welcome To Alberta West Online News

Blog Archive

About Me

Sunday, June 1, 2025

Water Availability