Identifying Indigenous Occupation Sites: Key Environmental Factors

Identifying likely locations of indigenous occupation sites relies heavily on understanding how past peoples interacted with their environment, particularly regarding water availability, elevation, and related landscape features. Modern archaeological practice uses a combination of fieldwork, GIS-based spatial analysis, and predictive modeling to pinpoint areas with a high probability of past human activity.

Key Factors in Site Prediction

• Proximity to Water:
  Water sources are the single most consistent predictor of indigenous occupation sites. Most large or dense artifact scatters are found within 100 meters of reliable waterways, such as rivers, creeks, lakes, or springs. In arid zones, even seasonal or ephemeral water sources can be significant. Areas near the coast, estuaries, and floodplains are also frequently associated with campsites, shell middens, and other archaeological features123.

• Elevation and Slope:
  Human groups often preferred well-drained, level, or gently sloping ground for campsites. Larger and more permanent sites tend to be on flat or slightly sloping terrain near water, while smaller, more temporary sites can be found on ridges, spurs, or uplands, often used as access routes or lookouts. For example, in some Australian valleys, occupation sites cluster on flat land less than 15 degrees slope near rivers, or on high ground at the edge of valley escarpments143.

• Micro-topography and Shelter:
  Micro-topographical features—such as spurs overlooking river bends, flat terraces on inside river bends, or the tops of escarpment edges—are often favored for their vantage points, ease of access, and protection from environmental extremes. Rock shelters at higher elevations, especially those with access to water and raw materials, are repeatedly occupied across different periods15.

• Resource Availability:
  Proximity to food and raw material sources—such as swamps, river flats, stone outcrops for tool-making, and areas with suitable trees—strongly influences site locations. Quarries are found where suitable stone is available, and scarred trees (from bark or wood harvesting) are found where old-growth native species survive near water125.

• Soil and Sediment Conditions:
  Burials and other sensitive sites often occur in soft sediments like sand dunes or river alluvium, which are easier to dig and may offer better preservation conditions12.

GIS and Predictive Modeling Approaches

Modern predictive models use GIS to integrate these factors:

• Distance to water bodies (e.g., sites within 100–300 meters of permanent water are high-probability zones)

• Slope and aspect (gentle slopes and favorable orientations for sunlight or wind protection)

• Elevation (preference for certain contour levels depending on the region)

• Geology and hydrology (availability of raw materials and water movement)

• Landscape features (floodplains, terraces, spurs, and escarpments)

The Multiple Criteria Evaluation (MCE) method allows researchers to weigh these variables systematically, producing ranked maps that guide field surveys and excavation efforts143.

Summary Table: Environmental Predictors of Indigenous Occupation Sites

Environmental Factor	Influence on Site Location
Proximity to Water	High probability within 100–300m of permanent water sources
Slope/Elevation	Preference for level/gently sloping ground; specific contour lines
Micro-topography	Spurs, terraces, escarpment edges, inside river bends
Resource Availability	Near food/raw material zones, stone outcrops, old-growth trees
Soil/Sediment	Soft sediments for burials, alluvium for campsites
Aspect/Exposure	Favorable sunlight, wind protection, aesthetic values

Conclusion

By analyzing water availability, elevation, slope, micro-topography, resource zones, and sediment conditions—often using GIS-based predictive modeling—archaeologists can effectively identify areas with a high likelihood of indigenous occupation. These methods not only improve the efficiency of archaeological surveys but also deepen our understanding of how past peoples interacted with their landscapes1243.

1. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1328/GSR2_Vines.pdf
2. https://www.agd.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/807716/Discovery_SitesandObjects.pdf
3. https://atlas.co/gis-use-cases/archaeological-site-prediction/
4. https://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc01/professional/papers/pap651/p651.htm
5. https://egqsj.copernicus.org/articles/68/201/2019/
6. https://www.academia.edu/2287574/GIS_based_spatial_analysis_for_archaeological_site_prediction_and_evaluation
7. https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/services/policy-guidance/practitioners-guide-impact-assessment-act/tailored-impact-statement-guidelines-projects-impact-assessment-act.html
8. https://www.arc.gov.au/news-publications/media/making-difference-publication/first-underwater-indigenous-sites-found-australian-seabed
9. https://askiy.usask.ca/documents/kastudentresearchprojects-compressed1.pdf
10. https://www.publish.csiro.au/mf/fulltext/MF23049
11. https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ieam.4869
12. https://www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1100100034922/1533666798632
13. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/sc-hc/H128-1-10-628-eng.pdf
14. https://www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1100100034982/1584021932182
15. https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1523967306962/1542198537347
16. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-10/documents/reference-guide-wqs-indian-tribes.pdf
17. https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2020/07/02/ancient-australian-aboriginal-sites-discovered-underwater.html
18. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-archaeology/articles/10.3389/fearc.2024.1438898/full
19. https://miningwatch.ca/blog/1999/9/1/aboriginal-peoples-and-mining-canada-six-case-studies
20. https://www.safewater.org/operation-water-spirit-1/2017/6/1/grade-nine-thematic-unit-first-nation-water-issues-case-studies
21. https://owa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Footprints-to-Follow.pdf
22. https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/540f3657-371b-4294-8f41-e4cbcfc5ed46/view/285599e6-2a31-4ee9-b70c-49b8640c27f1/Spicer_Neal_202004_MSc.pdf
23. https://www.forest-trends.org/blog/how-to-connect-indigenous-knowledge-and-scientific-research-for-greater-water-security/
24. https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/environmental-stewardship/Environmental-Studies/Pacific-Region/Studies/BOEM-2015-047.pdf
25. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/eiaer-eaame/approaches-approches.html
26. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/consultation/2022/esg/report
27. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.08.08.22278551v1.full
28. https://www.wri.org/news/release-new-landmark-data-measure-impacts-indigenous-peoples-and-local-communities-forests-and