The History of Bighorn Dam: From Controversial Creation to Alberta's Hydroelectric Powerhouse

The Bighorn Dam, constructed between 1969 and 1972 by Calgary Power (now TransAlta), represents a significant but contentious chapter in Alberta's infrastructure development. This 94-meter embankment dam on the North Saskatchewan River created Lake Abraham, Alberta's largest reservoir, and continues to be the province's most productive hydroelectric facility despite not being the largest. While providing essential electricity and flood control benefits, its development came at considerable environmental and social costs, particularly for Indigenous communities. The dam's construction occurred without proper environmental assessment or consultation processes that would be mandatory today, resulting in permanent alteration of traditional lands and displacement of the Bighorn Stoney Indigenous people.

Historical Context and Indigenous Presence

Long before plans for hydroelectric development, the Kootenay Plains area where Bighorn Dam now stands was home to Indigenous peoples, particularly the Bighorn Stoney. This region held profound significance for these communities, who used the lands for hunting, trapping, and permanent settlement. The verdant plains supported a robust Indigenous way of life, with established cabins, graves, and pastures scattered throughout the area.

The relationship between these Indigenous communities and their ancestral lands was severed through development decisions that prioritized industrial and economic considerations over Indigenous rights and environmental stewardship. This historical context is crucial for understanding both the pre-dam ecology of the region and the full scope of the dam's lasting impacts on local communities^[1][2].

Pre-Development Cultural Significance

Before the dam's construction, the Kootenay Plains had immense cultural and practical significance for the Bighorn Stoney Indigenous people. This area provided sustenance through hunting and trapping traditions that had been maintained for generations. The region was not merely a resource base but a cultural homeland containing sacred sites, burial grounds, and community gathering spaces that formed the bedrock of Indigenous identity and spirituality in the area^[2].

Silas Abraham, a guide from the Stoney Nakoda First Nations after whom Lake Abraham would later be named, represented the deep connection between Indigenous people and this landscape. Originally from Morley, Alberta, he was a resident who used the foothills of the Rocky Mountains for hunting, farming, and guiding newly arriving pioneers around the area in the early 1900s^[3].

Planning and Authorization (1960s)

The conceptualization of Bighorn Dam began in the 1960s when Calgary Power (later renamed TransAlta) identified the hydroelectric potential of the North Saskatchewan River. The provincial government of Alberta enthusiastically backed the project, primarily to increase winter river flow for flood control and industrial purposes. This period marked a significant transition in Alberta's approach to energy development, as the province sought to expand its hydroelectric capacity to complement thermal energy production.

The planning process reflected the different priorities and regulatory environment of the era. Calgary Power negotiated a financial subsidy from the Alberta government to offset the higher costs of hydroelectric power compared to thermal power generation. This arrangement reflected the company's strategic approach, as explained by company president G.A. Gaherty who noted that while "the capital cost of generating power at Bighorn would be greater than expanding its thermal plants nearer Edmonton," the company was willing to proceed because "hydro power does offer certain inherent advantages over thermal power, such as operating flexibility and stable long term operating costs"^[4].

Regulatory Gaps

Critically, the planning process in the 1960s lacked environmental impact assessments or public hearings that would be standard practice today^[1]. This absence of thorough evaluation would later have profound consequences for both the local environment and Indigenous communities. The failure to conduct proper environmental and social impact studies represents one of the most controversial aspects of the dam's development, reflecting an era before comprehensive environmental protection legislation^[2].

Calgary Power "drove a fairly hard bargain with the province, extracting a subsidy to compensate for the higher costs of developing hydro-power as compared to thermal electricity"^[4]. This financial arrangement illustrated the economic calculations that prioritized energy development over potential environmental and social impacts.

Construction Phase (1969-1972)

Construction of the Bighorn Dam commenced in 1969 at Windy Point in the Front Ranges of the Canadian Rockies, west of the confluence of the North Saskatchewan River and the Bighorn River^[2]. The construction project represented a major engineering undertaking for the time, creating what would become a 94-meter high embankment dam capable of generating significant hydroelectric power.

By December 1970, specialized construction techniques were being implemented, including work on a concrete cut-off wall for the dam. The dam was founded on approximately 200 feet of sands and gravels that required sealing with a 2-foot thick concrete cut-off wall. This specialized construction took place within a large heated enclosure where temperature was maintained above 50°F, utilizing bentonite slurry to maintain an open 2-foot wide vertical-sided trench that was subsequently backfilled with concrete^[5].

The Bighorn Dam Incident

During construction, an unusual event occurred that has become part of local folklore. On August 24, 1969, five workers at the construction site—Harley Peterson, Guy L'Heureux, Stan Peterson, Floyd Engen, and Dale Boddy—reported seeing what they believed was a large Sasquatch-like creature watching them from a ridge above the site^[6].

According to witness accounts, the figure remained standing in that spot for about half an hour, then sat down for about 10 minutes before standing again for approximately 15 minutes. It then reportedly walked along the ridge and disappeared into the tree line. When two workers went to the ridge to investigate, the men on the ground used comparison with trees to estimate the figure's height at 12-15 feet tall^[6]. The year 1969 is considered significant in Sasquatch research circles, with John Green even writing a book titled "Year of the Sasquatch" about the numerous reported sightings that year^[6].

Completion and Naming

The Bighorn Dam was completed and commissioned in 1972, creating Lake Abraham, Alberta's largest reservoir with a surface area of 53.7 km² and a length of 32 km^[1]. During the final stages of construction in February 1972, the Government of Alberta held a contest to name the newly formed reservoir^[3]. Students from across Alberta submitted ideas based on historical significance, geography, prominent people, and topography of the area.

The government ultimately decided to name the lake after Silas Abraham, a local Nakoda-Stony First Nations man who had used the area for hunting, farming, and guiding early pioneers in the early 1900s^[3]. This naming represented an acknowledgment of the Indigenous history of the region, though it came as the dam's construction was simultaneously erasing much of that physical history.

Technical Specifications and Operations

The Bighorn Dam is classified as an embankment dam standing 94 meters tall, impounding the North Saskatchewan River in Clearwater County, Alberta^[1][2]. The reservoir it created, Lake Abraham, has a surface area of 53.7 km² (20.7 sq mi), a maximum length of 32 km (20 mi), and a maximum width of 3.3 km (2.1 mi)^[1]. The normal elevation of the reservoir is 1,340 meters (4,400 ft) above sea level^[1].

From a power generation perspective, the Bighorn Hydro Plant has an installed capacity of 120 megawatts with a maximum hydraulic head of 91 meters (299 ft)^[1]. Its capacity factor is 38.8%, enabling it to produce an average of 408 gigawatt-hours (1,470 TJ) annually^[1]. This makes it Alberta's most productive hydroelectric facility despite not being the largest in terms of installed capacity. The Bighorn Plant is actually the second largest hydro facility owned by TransAlta, with the largest being Brazeau Dam, yet Bighorn has an available water supply that allows it to be the largest producer of hydroelectric energy in the province^[2].

Operational Role

TransAlta's hydroelectric plants, including Bighorn, primarily provide electricity during periods of peak electrical demand and ensure system stability. Their operating flexibility allows them to start quickly and introduce hydropower within minutes, balancing out shortages due to unexpected outages or providing power during high demand periods^[7]. This quick-response capability makes the dam a valuable component of Alberta's energy grid.

The dam is designed to store 1.165 million acre-feet of water in the 13,700-acre Lake Abraham^[4]. In addition to power generation, the dam serves important water management functions, including flood control and improving winter river flow for industrial purposes downstream^[4].

Environmental and Social Impacts

The construction of the Bighorn Dam had profound and lasting environmental and social consequences, particularly for Indigenous communities. By 1978, the rising waters had completely flooded the Kootenay Plains, displacing the Bighorn Stoney Indigenous people and destroying their cabins, graves, and traditional hunting and trapping grounds^[1]. This displacement occurred without proper consultation or compensation, reflecting the lack of environmental and social impact assessment during the planning phase^[2].

The formation of Lake Abraham dramatically altered the local ecosystem, transforming a river valley and plains environment into a large reservoir. The water levels in the lake fluctuate dramatically from season to season, with more water leaving the reservoir than entering from approximately November to June, resulting in very low water levels in late spring and early summer^[8]. In winter, the dropping water levels can create large gaps between the water's surface and the ice several feet above, leaving thick slabs of ice sitting on rocky beaches as the water recedes from the lake's edges^[8].

The Ice Bubbles Phenomenon

One of the most visually striking environmental features resulting from the dam's creation is the famous ice bubble phenomenon on Lake Abraham. When the lake freezes in winter, methane gas released by the decay of trees and grass that were covered by water during the dam's creation becomes trapped in the ice, creating stacked layers of bubbles^[8]. While many lakes have ice bubbles, they are particularly visible on Abraham Lake due to the tremendous winds that clear the ice surface of snow^[8]. This feature has ironically become a major tourist attraction, drawing photographers and visitors to witness this unintended consequence of submerging a forest ecosystem.

Modern Environmental Challenges

In recent decades, the dam and Lake Abraham have become popular recreational destinations, leading to new environmental challenges including erosion, vandalism, and safety concerns. The increasing tourism and recreational use have created management challenges that require ongoing mitigation efforts. In 2021, the Alberta government implemented protective measures including seasonal off-highway vehicle restrictions and increased funding for infrastructure and remediation.

Economic Benefits and Water Management

The Bighorn Dam represents a significant asset in Alberta's energy infrastructure. With a capacity of 120 megawatts and average annual production of 408 gigawatt-hours, it provides clean hydroelectric power to the provincial grid^[9]. This energy production is sufficient to power approximately 36,000 households annually, based on the average Canadian home's consumption of 11,000 kilowatts per year^[3].

Beyond electricity generation, the dam was designed as a multipurpose project undertaken jointly by Calgary Power and the Alberta government^[10]. In addition to power production, the project was intended to assist the government's water management program by providing better distribution of Alberta's water resources between the northern and southern sections of the province^[10]. It was also designed to make diversion of part of the North Saskatchewan River into the Red Deer River system economically feasible^[10].

The dam's role in flood control has proven valuable, particularly in managing seasonal water flow fluctuations. The controlled releases from the dam help maintain consistent downstream water levels, protecting communities and infrastructure along the North Saskatchewan River from potential flooding events^[11].

Economic Value of Recreation

Despite its environmental challenges, the creation of Lake Abraham has contributed to the regional outdoor recreation economy. As Alberta's largest reservoir, the lake has become a significant tourist destination, particularly for its winter ice bubbles phenomenon^[8]. This tourism generates economic activity for nearby communities, though this must be balanced against the environmental impact of increased visitation.

The economic value of outdoor recreation on crown lands like those surrounding Bighorn Dam is substantial. According to research, Albertan outdoor enthusiasts spend an average of $258 per day trip and $757 per overnight trip^[12]. While spending related to recreational trips to crown lands only accounts for 0.8 percent of Alberta's GDP, the employment resulting from this spending is 6.1 times greater than employment in the forest and logging industry^[12].

Current Status and Future Challenges

Today, the Bighorn Dam continues to operate as a key component of Alberta's energy infrastructure under the management of TransAlta, which took over operations after Calgary Power was renamed. The facility remains Alberta's most productive hydroelectric plant, generating an average of 408 gigawatt-hours annually despite not being the largest facility in terms of capacity^[7].

TransAlta periodically conducts controlled water releases from the dam to manage water levels in Abraham Lake. In July 2021, such a release was conducted as part of a "proactive operation to manage water elevation" at Abraham Lake^[13]. These releases require careful management and communication with downstream communities, as they can significantly affect river conditions. During the 2021 release, river flows increased over several days to reach approximately 175 m³/s, which was at the upper end of normal river flows below the dam but higher than typical seasonal flows^[13].

Future Water Supply Concerns

Perhaps the most significant long-term challenge facing the Bighorn Dam relates to climate change impacts on water supply. Research from the University of British Columbia has identified the Bighorn Dam as among four locations in Alberta most at risk of summer water shortages due to predicted glacier loss. Current models predict that Western Canada will lose 70 to 90 percent of its glacier ice volume by 2100^[14].

This deglaciation is expected to substantially change water supply patterns for the dam. As researcher Sam Anderson noted, "These places are going to see substantial changes to their water supply. That will include having lower August flows on average, and a larger range of possible flows year to year. It's not that the rivers will run dry and they'll have no options, but these communities and locations will need to look for different water management strategies in the future that will help them manage the late summer period"^[14].

Conclusion

The history of the Bighorn Dam reflects the complex interplay between energy development, economic priorities, environmental impacts, and Indigenous rights. Built during a period when environmental assessment and consultation processes were not required, its development permanently altered both the landscape and human communities connected to it. The dam has provided significant benefits in terms of clean energy production, flood control, and recreational opportunities, but these have come with substantial environmental and social costs that continue to reverberate today.

The legacy of Bighorn Dam serves as an important case study in how infrastructure development approaches have evolved over time. Modern dam projects would be subject to rigorous environmental assessment, Indigenous consultation, and public hearing processes that were noticeably absent in the planning and construction of Bighorn. This historical context provides valuable lessons for future infrastructure development, particularly regarding the importance of comprehensive impact assessment and meaningful consultation with affected communities.

As Alberta and the Bighorn Dam face future challenges related to climate change, water management, and balancing recreational use with environmental protection, the complex history of this facility offers important context for decision-making. The dam's past, present, and future illustrate the ongoing tension between development priorities and environmental stewardship that continues to shape infrastructure management across Canada and beyond.

⁂

⁂

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bighorn_Dam         
• https://kids.kiddle.co/Bighorn_Dam       
• https://guide1214.com/abraham-lake    
• https://prism.ucalgary.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/a8be9718-6ea9-40ac-ad88-7de4f5486828/content    
• https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/items/997a0361-3786-447b-9cf8-c2f5954903c1 
• https://sasquatchalberta.com/classic-encounters/the-bighorn-dam-incident/   
• https://transalta.com/about-us/our-operations/facilities/bighorn/  
• https://davidthompsoncountry.ca/explore/abraham-lake-ice-bubbles-and-more/     
• https://discoverapega.ca/stories/bighorn-dam-produces-its-first-megawatt/ 
• https://www66.statcan.gc.ca/eng/1973/197305990587_p. 587.pdf   
• https://globalnews.ca/news/8045223/bighorn-dam-release-north-saskatchewan-river/ 
• https://outdoorcouncil.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/TIAA-crown-lands-report.pdf  
• https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/water-release-bighorn-dam-1.6110356  
• https://science.ubc.ca/news/deglaciation-will-cause-water-shortages-alberta’s-bighorn-dam-and-other-sites