Alberta West News: Side effects of electrofishing in rivers and streams

Based on the comprehensive research gathered, I now have sufficient information to provide a detailed answer about the side effects of electrofishing in rivers and streams. Let me compile this into a thorough report.

Side Effects of Electrofishing in Rivers and Streams

Electrofishing, while widely used as a fish sampling technique in freshwater environments, produces a range of adverse effects on aquatic organisms and ecosystems. The severity and nature of these impacts depend on multiple factors including electrical parameters, species characteristics, and environmental conditions.

Spinal and Musculoskeletal Injuries

The most extensively documented side effect of electrofishing is spinal injury and associated tissue damage. Research has revealed that internal vertebral injuries frequently occur without external symptoms, making detection difficult without X-ray analysis or necropsy. Studies on rainbow trout have documented spinal injury rates ranging from 12% to 98%, depending on the electrical current type used. When pulsed direct current (PDC) is employed, injury incidence reaches 40-54%, compared to only 12% with smooth direct current.nature+5

These injuries manifest as vertebral compression, spinal misalignment, and fractures, often accompanied by multifocal hemorrhages in muscle tissue. The injuries result from powerful myoclonic jerks—involuntary muscular convulsions that occur when fish are exposed to the electrical field. Critically, these spinal injuries can occur anywhere in the electrofishing field at or above the intensity threshold for the twitch response, not just near the electrodes.carleton+2

The long-term consequences of spinal injuries are substantial. While most fish survive the initial injury, growth rates become severely impaired. Fish with moderate to severe spinal injuries showed minimal length and weight gains over a 335-day period, with the most severely injured fish actually losing weight and condition. Although spinal injuries heal over time through calcification and fusion of damaged vertebrae, few fish develop outwardly visible deformities, allowing injured populations to persist undetected.warnercnr.colostate+1

Hemorrhaging and Circulatory Damage

Electrofishing causes widespread hemorrhaging across multiple organ systems. Gross examinations consistently reveal multifocal hemorrhages in skin, gills, skeletal muscles, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and brain. Hemopericardium—blood accumulation around the heart—was observed in 84% of examined fish in one study. Intraocular hemorrhages and gill bleeding are also common, with mountain whitefish being particularly susceptible to gill hemorrhaging.gov+2

The circulatory damage stems from electricity flowing preferentially along blood vessels, which are excellent conductors. This causes damage to endothelial cells and myocytes, potentially leading to thrombosis and subsequent organ dysfunction. Zenker's necrosis—a form of severe muscle fiber degeneration—was documented in 87% of fish examined in some studies, along with rhabdomyolysis and myoglobin accumulation in renal tissue.nature+1

Mortality Rates

Direct mortality from electrofishing varies widely based on equipment settings, environmental conditions, and species susceptibility. Overall mortality rates typically range from 1.8% to 14%, though rates as high as 75% have been documented under certain conditions. Mortality usually results from asphyxiation caused by excessive exposure to tetanizing electrical intensities near electrodes, or from poor handling procedures after capture.academic.oup+5

Illegal or improperly conducted electrofishing with high-voltage "homemade" devices can cause immediate death through cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, or asystolia. Fish captured through narcosis (temporarily stunned) experience significantly lower mortality (5%) compared to those subjected to tetanization (14%).academic.oup+1

Physiological Stress and Recovery Time

Electrofishing induces severe physiological stress responses manifested through dramatic increases in blood lactate and cortisol levels. Blood lactate concentrations double immediately after electrical exposure and can remain elevated for up to six hours before returning to normal. This lactate accumulation results from intense anaerobic muscular contractions, similar to extreme physical exertion.wildlifeprofessional

Oxygen consumption increases by 110-130% immediately following electrofishing, with recovery requiring 30 to 80 minutes depending on current type. Plasma cortisol levels—a primary stress indicator—increase significantly and require approximately six hours to return to baseline. These physiological changes indicate that fish are not fully recovered simply because they regain equilibrium and swim away.academic.oup+1

Behavioral Alterations

Electroshocked fish exhibit profound behavioral changes lasting several hours to days. Cutthroat trout subjected to electrofishing immediately sought cover, remained inactive, ceased feeding, and were easily approached by divers. An average of 3-4 hours was required for 50% of fish to return to seemingly normal behavior, though recovery varied widely among collection sites.academic.oup

Hatchery-reared fish generally recovered in 2-3 hours, while wild fish required at least 24 hours to fully recover their feeding and aggression behaviors. Socially dominant fish appeared to recover faster than subordinate individuals. These behavioral changes can violate key assumptions of population estimation methods, particularly the assumption of equal catchability across sampling passes.academic.oup

Species-Specific Susceptibility

Salmonids (trout, char, and salmon) exhibit markedly higher susceptibility to electrofishing injuries and mortality compared to most other fish families. Burbot and sculpins are also particularly vulnerable to electrofishing mortality under certain conditions. Conversely, species with heavier scaling—including centrarchids (bass and sunfish), percids (perch and walleye), esocids (pike), and cyprinids (minnows and carp)—demonstrate greater resistance to electrical shock.smith-root+3

Species reported as particularly susceptible to spinal injuries include goldeye, some suckers, channel catfish, largemouth bass, walleye, and paddlefish. Scale-less and fine-scaled fishes require lower electrical settings (20-30 Hz frequency, 10-20% duty cycle) to minimize injury, while heavily scaled species may require higher settings (50-60 Hz, 20-30% duty cycle) for effective capture.outriggeroutdoors+2

Size-Dependent Effects

Larger fish generally experience higher susceptibility to electrofishing injury because voltage differential across the fish body increases with body length. Studies found that approximately 40% of trout longer than 200 mm sustained injury compared to 27% in smaller fish. The incidence and severity of spinal injuries show positive correlations with fish length (r = 0.79-0.83).montana+2

However, the relationship between size and mortality is complex. Some studies report greater mortality among smaller fish, possibly due to their inability to withstand the electrical intensity required to capture larger individuals in the same field. Capture probability in electrofishing typically increases with body size for young fish but may plateau or decline for very large individuals.waves-vagues.dfo-mpo+1

Effects on Embryos, Larvae, and Reproduction

Electrofishing conducted over spawning grounds can harm fish embryos present in or on the substrate. Field intensity and exposure duration appear to be the most critical factors affecting embryos and larvae. Studies demonstrate that electrofishing during spawning events significantly reduces the downstream presence of fertilized eggs, suggesting temporary disruption of spawning behavior.reabic+3

In grass carp spawning grounds, the probability of capturing eggs downstream was significantly lower when electrofishing operations were concurrent in spawning areas. This spawning disruption appears to result from behavioral disturbance rather than direct egg mortality, as the high voltage gradients needed to kill eggs in open water make direct embryo mortality unlikely. The effects on reproductive success and future recruitment remain poorly understood and require further investigation.latrobe+1

Environmental and Ecosystem Impacts

Beyond direct effects on fish, electrofishing disrupts broader aquatic ecosystem components. Studies document increased invertebrate drift rates, with some taxa showing up to 70% increases, though overall benthic standing stock declines are typically limited to 5-10%. Electrofishing activities can cause short-term declines (34%) in biofilm chlorophyll standing stocks in some stream systems.academic.oup

Macroinvertebrate communities experience shifts in size distribution following electrofishing, though effects are spatially limited and short-lived due to high recolonization rates. Non-target organisms including amphibians and other aquatic species may also be affected, though research on these impacts remains limited.fisheries+1

Cumulative Effects of Repeated Sampling

The stress and injuries from multiple electrofishing events accumulate over time. The incidence of total injuries among captured fish increases cumulatively not only during multiple-pass sessions but across successive seasons or years of sampling. Some newly captured fish exhibit injuries from prior treatments, having either escaped effective portions of the electric field during previous sessions or recovered sufficiently to resume normal activity.carleton

Repeated handling associated with multiple electrofishing events can have greater impact on delayed mortality than repeated electrical exposures alone. This cumulative stress poses particular concerns for endangered or threatened species subjected to routine monitoring programs.academic.oup+2

Factors Affecting Injury and Mortality

Electrical Parameters: Pulse frequency emerges as the primary factor affecting spinal injury incidence, with frequencies above 60 Hz causing substantially more damage than lower frequencies (20-40 Hz). Duty cycle should generally remain below 25%, with 10-20% considered optimal to minimize injury while maintaining capture efficiency. Voltage and exposure duration directly correlate with mortality rates—higher intensities and longer exposures increase both physiological stress and death rates.fao+4

Water Conductivity: Low conductivity water (<150 µS/cm) requires higher voltages to achieve effective electrofishing, potentially increasing injury risk, while high conductivity (>1000 µS/cm) allows lower voltages and improved fish welfare when settings are properly adjusted.thescientificflyangler+2

Water Temperature: Temperature influences both electrical conductivity and fish physiology, affecting susceptibility to injury and stress. Warmer temperatures generally increase metabolic stress responses.invasivemusselcollaborative

Fish Condition: Physiological condition affects susceptibility to electrofishing injury and mortality. Fish already stressed or in poor condition exhibit higher vulnerability to electrical trauma.carleton

Minimizing Harmful Effects

Best practices to reduce electrofishing impacts include using smooth direct current (DC) whenever practical instead of pulsed DC, as it causes fewer spinal injuries. When PDC is necessary, frequency should be minimized (20-40 Hz for most species), duty cycle kept low (10-25%), and voltage set to the minimum effective level.efish-solutions+4

Operators should avoid electrofishing over spawning grounds during reproductive periods, limit sampling to essential efforts only, minimize exposure time for each fish, and ensure proper handling techniques after capture. Multiple electrofishing events in the same location should be spaced adequately to allow population recovery. Trained personnel, proper equipment maintenance, and adherence to established protocols are essential for minimizing both fish welfare impacts and human safety risks.cleanwaterpro+3

Alternative Sampling Methods

Given the documented adverse effects, researchers increasingly advocate for non-destructive alternatives when appropriate. Underwater video analysis shows higher detection rates than electrofishing for some applications while eliminating physical contact with fish. Other methods including visual surveys (snorkeling), passive traps, gill nets, seines, and hydroacoustics can supplement or replace electrofishing depending on study objectives and environmental conditions.watershed+3

The choice of sampling method should balance data quality requirements against potential harm to fish populations, with particular consideration for imperiled, endangered, or sensitive species.publications+2

Alberta West News

Welcome To Alberta West Online News

Blog Archive

About Me

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Side effects of electrofishing in rivers and streams