The Ideological Imperatives of "America First": A Historical and Political Analysis

The phrase "America First" has been a recurring element in American political discourse for over a century, evolving from a simple nationalist sentiment into a complex ideological framework. Today, it represents a set of principles about America's place in the world, its relationship with other nations, and its domestic priorities. This report examines the core ideological imperatives that underpin the "America First" concept, tracing its historical origins, evolution, and contemporary manifestations.

The slogan "America First" has deeper historical roots than many realize, dating back to the 19th century. It originated from the nativist American Party in the 1850s and appeared as a Republican campaign slogan in the 1880s7. However, it was President Woodrow Wilson who first popularized it nationally in 1915 as he attempted to maintain American neutrality in World War I while navigating between isolationist pressures and his own internationalist tendencies8.

The phrase gained further prominence when Senator Warren G. Harding adopted it during his successful 1920 presidential campaign7. During this same period, the slogan was embraced by the Ku Klux Klan during its membership peak in the 1920s, when many of its members sought political office. This association began to imbue the phrase with nativist and white supremacist overtones7. The Immigration Act of 1924, which restricted immigration based on national origin and ethnicity, represented a legislative embodiment of these sentiments7.

The most notorious iteration came with the formation of the America First Committee (AFC) in September 1940. Founded by Yale Law School student R. Douglas Stuart Jr. and chaired by retired U.S. Army general Robert E. Wood, this organization grew to over 800,000 members across 450 chapters2. The AFC primarily opposed American entry into World War II, arguing that "no foreign power could successfully attack a strongly defended United States" and that "a British defeat by Nazi Germany would not imperil American national security"2. The organization's most recognizable spokesman was aviation hero Charles Lindbergh, whose public statements often drew on anti-Semitic tropes4.

In contemporary American politics, Donald Trump resurrected the slogan during his 2016 presidential campaign. He incorporated it into his inaugural address and established it as the official foreign policy doctrine of his administration79. This modern invocation represents another evolutionary stage in the concept's development, one that connects to its historical precedents while adapting to present-day circumstances and concerns.

At its ideological core, "America First" emphasizes a strong sense of nationalism and national sovereignty. It represents "a populist political theory in the United States that emphasizes the fundamental notion of putting America first," generally involving policies of "non-interventionism, American nationalism, and protectionist trade policy"7.

In contemporary usage, particularly under the Trump administration, this nationalism was explicitly framed around the concept of sovereignty. The official White House statement on Trump's "America First Foreign Policy" declared that "Strong sovereign nations are key to international peace" and defined the approach as "America First means America will put its citizens, its values, and its concerns, first, like all nations should"6. This framing attempts to normalize nationalist priorities as the natural and proper orientation of any nation-state.

Proponents of this ideology contend that it represents traditional American values rather than a departure from them. They often cite historical figures like George Washington, who warned against "entangling foreign alliances" in his Farewell Address, and John Quincy Adams, who stated that America "goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy"12. In this view, "America First" is not isolationism but a return to foundational principles established by the nation's early leaders.

A second crucial ideological imperative of "America First" is economic protectionism, which stands in direct opposition to free trade and economic globalization. In its modern manifestation, this aspect of the ideology represents a reaction against decades of increasing global economic integration that many supporters believe has disadvantaged American workers and industries9.

This economic nationalism manifests in policies like tariffs on imports, renegotiation of trade agreements, and opposition to multilateral economic institutions. Trump's implementation of a 25% tariff on Canadian imports exemplifies this approach, prioritizing what is perceived as economic self-interest even at the cost of straining relationships with traditional allies9.

The underlying premise is that global economic arrangements have benefited elites and foreign nations at the expense of ordinary Americans. This view connects economic frustration with broader populist themes of anti-elitism and the perception that "a virtuous people is being repressed"5. Research has linked this sentiment to "economic frustration and perceived hopelessness" and a sense that the American dream has become "increasingly elusive"5.

A third fundamental imperative of "America First" ideology is a skeptical approach to international engagement, particularly military interventions abroad. This position has historically been characterized as "non-interventionist" rather than purely isolationist, as it does not necessarily reject all forms of international engagement7.

During the pre-World War II period, the America First Committee opposed measures to support Britain against Nazi Germany, such as the destroyers-for-bases deal and the Lend-Lease bill2. The committee argued that providing military aid to Britain risked "dragging the United States into the war" and insisted that American security did not depend on the outcome of the European conflict2.

In its contemporary form, this imperative manifests as opposition to military interventions deemed unnecessary for America's direct security interests and skepticism toward international alliances and organizations. Under Trump, this meant moving "away from globalist policies and strengthening international pacts such as NATO" while gearing motivations toward "what is best for America"9. The Trump administration portrayed this approach as making "foreign policy decisions based on outcomes, not on ideology" and encouraging "the nations of the world to do their share"6.

Advocates of this perspective argue that it represents prudent self-interest rather than selfish disengagement. As articulated by the American Cornerstone Institute, "President Trump's America First foreign policy was not a policy of isolationism, but simply a return to the foreign policy of our Founding Fathers"12. This framing attempts to ground non-interventionism in American historical tradition rather than as a rejection of international responsibility.

A fourth imperative, sometimes implicit rather than explicit, involves the preservation of a particular conception of American identity and culture. Historically, "America First" has been associated with nativist movements that sought to restrict immigration and maintain a particular demographic and cultural composition of American society7.

During the 1920s, the slogan was embraced by the KKK and others who supported the Immigration Act of 1924, which excluded immigrants on the basis of ethnicity and national origin "in an effort to preserve white racial demographics"7. This aspect of "America First" ideology connects to broader currents of nativism in American political history.

In contemporary discourse, this imperative manifests in more coded language about national sovereignty and cultural integrity. The "America First" tradition has been described by some scholars as "an expression of a fascist politics of national identity rooted in American history"11. This perspective suggests that the concept addresses fundamental questions about American identity: "both 'who are we?' and 'how should we act in international affairs?'"11.

This dimension of "America First" ideology reflects what some researchers characterize as "strongly drawn exclusionary boundaries against perceived outsiders," with "international engagement, immigrants, and refugees identified as causes of the 'lost hope'"5. This connection between economic anxiety and identity politics represents a powerful emotional component of the ideology's appeal.

The "America First" ideology has been subject to extensive criticism throughout its history. Critics point to its associations with anti-Semitism, particularly through the America First Committee of the early 1940s. Charles Lindbergh, the committee's most prominent spokesman, delivered speeches that drew on anti-Semitic tropes, suggesting that Jewish Americans were pushing the country toward war4. Some historians note that while the America First Committee included diverse political perspectives, it was "controversial for the anti-Semitic and pro-fascist views of some of its most prominent speakers, leaders, and members"2.

The phrase also carries troubling historical baggage through its association with the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s and with William Randolph Hearst, whose newspapers ran "America First" on their mastheads while providing "positive coverage of the Nazis" and running columns "without rebuttal, by Hitler, Mussolini, and Nazi leader Hermann Göring"13. These historical connections have led some critics to argue that when Trump uses the phrase, he is "connecting himself to the Ku Klux Klan and outright fascist movements"13.

More broadly, critics contend that "America First" represents a dangerously narrow conception of national interest that undermines international cooperation necessary to address global challenges. Some have derided Trump's use of the slogan as promoting "America Alone" rather than genuine independence7.

The "America First" ideology has demonstrated remarkable resilience in American political discourse, appearing and reappearing at various historical junctures. Its core ideological imperatives—nationalism, economic protectionism, foreign policy non-interventionism, and cultural preservation—continue to resonate with segments of the American public despite, or perhaps because of, their controversial nature.

The slogan has endured because it offers answers to perennial American questions about national identity and action11. It provides a framework for understanding America's role in the world that appeals to those who feel threatened by globalization, immigration, and changing cultural norms. While critics see it as a dangerous retreat from international leadership and cooperation, supporters view it as a return to foundational American principles.

Understanding the ideological imperatives of "America First" requires recognizing both its explicit policy orientations and its implicit emotional appeals. It represents not simply a set of policy positions but a worldview that shapes how its adherents understand America's past, present, and future. Whether one sees this worldview as a necessary correction or a dangerous regression, its influence on American politics and foreign policy continues to be profound.

Citations:

1. https://geopoliticalfutures.com/the-debate-over-america-first/
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_First_Committee
3. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/Narang.pdf
4. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/podcasts/10-minute-talks-america-first-and-american-fascism/
5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7604484/
6. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-united-nations-general-assembly-outlining-america-first-foreign-policy/
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_First_(policy)
8. https://www.vox.com/2018/10/22/17940964/america-first-trump-sarah-churchwell-american-dream
9. https://www.alligator.org/article/2025/03/opinion-the-trump-doctrine
10. https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/the-truth-about-the-america-first-movement
11. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/fascism-in-america/america-first/FD7AF598E284A1CAA6413B4761A4CEA3
12. https://americancornerstone.org/the-principles-of-an-america-first-foreign-policy/
13. https://fpif.org/the-ugly-origins-of-trumps-america-first-policy/
14. https://time.com/7006686/history-america-first-dawes/
15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/11926422.2020.1745253
16. https://tnsr.org/2019/12/whither-the-city-upon-a-hill-donald-trump-america-first-and-american-exceptionalism/
17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26499708
18. https://dominotheory.com/what-does-america-first-foreign-policy-actually-mean/
19. https://bulletin.kenyon.edu/article/the-meaning-of-america-first/
20. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/09/09/america-first-american-dream-trumpism/
21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_ideologies_in_the_United_States
22. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/trumps-america-first-is-america-the-small/
23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13569317.2020.1699717
24. https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2020/10/research-shows-link-between-criminal-arrests-and-america-first-ideology/
25. https://www.britannica.com/topic/America-First-Committee
26. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13691481211048499?download=true
27. https://www.citystgeorges.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2025/january/trump-america-first
28. https://scholarworks.arcadia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=agsjournal
29. https://www.thecairoreview.com/covid-19-global-crisis/america-first-in-a-world-crisis/