Operation Catapult: The British Attack on the French Fleet at Mers-el-Kébir
Operation Catapult stands as one of the most controversial naval actions of World War II, when British forces attacked their former French allies to prevent their fleet from potentially falling into German hands. On July 3, 1940, British warships bombarded the French fleet anchored at Mers-el-Kébir, Algeria, resulting in the deaths of nearly 1,300 French sailors and causing a deep diplomatic rift between the two nations. This attack, described by Winston Churchill as "the most hateful decision, the most unnatural and painful in which I have ever been concerned," represents a complex moral and strategic dilemma that continues to be debated by historians today.
In the summer of 1940, the rapid collapse of France and its subsequent armistice with Nazi Germany on June 22 created an unprecedented strategic crisis for Great Britain. The French fleet, the second largest naval force in Europe after the Royal Navy, suddenly represented a potential existential threat if it fell under Axis control. Of particular concern to the British War Cabinet were the five battleships of the Bretagne and Richelieu classes and the two fast battleships of the Dunkerque class that could potentially shift the naval balance of power decisively against Britain3.
Despite repeated assurances from Admiral François Darlan, commander of the French Navy, that the fleet would never be surrendered to Germany, the British leadership remained deeply skeptical. The armistice terms between France and Germany included a provision stating that the German government "solemnly and firmly declared that it had no intention of making demands regarding the French fleet during the peace negotiations," but Churchill and the War Cabinet judged this to be an unacceptable risk3. The German occupation of France had already given the Nazi regime control of French Atlantic ports, and the prospect of the powerful French fleet falling into enemy hands threatened Britain's naval supremacy in the Mediterranean and its ability to maintain vital supply lines.
Diplomatic efforts to secure the French fleet were frustrated by mutual distrust and resentment between the former allies8. Churchill's war cabinet ultimately determined that they could not rely on French promises, particularly after Darlan repeatedly refused British requests to place the fleet in British custody or move it to the French West Indies, out of German reach3. On June 27, 1940, the British War Cabinet ordered the Royal Navy to seize or destroy all French warships in British and North African ports2.
Operation Catapult was the code name for the British plan to neutralize or destroy French ships to prevent them from falling into German hands. Vice Admiral Sir James Somerville was ordered to take the newly-formed Force H to Algeria2. This powerful naval force comprised the battlecruiser HMS Hood, battleships HMS Valiant and Resolution, aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal, cruisers HMS Arethusa and HMS Enterprise, and eleven destroyers4.
The British Admiralty gave Somerville explicit instructions to secure the transfer, surrender, or destruction of the French warships at Mers-el-Kébir2. On July 3, 1940, Force H arrived off Mers-el-Kébir, where a significant portion of the French fleet under Admiral Marcel Gensoul was anchored. The French force included the battlecruisers Dunkerque and Strasbourg, battleships Provence and Bretagne, the seaplane carrier Commandant Teste, and several destroyers13.
Captain Cedric "Hooky" Holland, captain of the Ark Royal who was fluent in French, was assigned to personally negotiate with Admiral Gensoul. Holland transferred to the destroyer HMS Foxhound at Gibraltar and proceeded towards Mers-el-Kébir4. Permission from the French to enter the harbor was not given, and initial negotiations were carried out just outside the harbor anti-submarine boom. Admiral Gensoul refused to meet with Holland on the basis of discrepancy of rank, insisting that Admiral Somerville should have attended in person4.
The ultimatum presented to the French offered four options: join the British in continuing to fight against Germany and Italy; sail to British ports with reduced crews; sail to French West Indies or American ports where the ships would be demilitarized; or scuttle their ships within six hours. If none of these options were accepted, Somerville was ordered to destroy the French fleet3.
To put further pressure on Admiral Gensoul, Swordfish aircraft from HMS Ark Royal dropped magnetic mines in the harbor entrances at Mers-el-Kébir and Oran, sealing the French fleet inside its ports4. During this operation, French Curtiss H-75 fighters intercepted the British aircraft and shot down a Skua, killing its two crew members—the only British fatalities in the action1.
After protracted negotiations throughout the day, during which the French fleet prepared to sail and came to action stations while Force H steamed back and forth on the horizon, Admiral Gensoul finally agreed to meet the British delegation aboard the Dunkerque. However, no further compromise could be reached4. At 1620 hours, a message was received from Admiral Darlan's headquarters stating that the Admiral of the Fleet had ordered all French Naval Forces in the Mediterranean to rally to Admiral Gensoul, effectively ending any hope for a peaceful resolution4.
At 5:54 PM on July 3, Churchill ordered the British ships to open fire, and Somerville's Force H commenced bombardment from 17,500 yards1. The British had several advantages: they could maneuver freely while the French ships were anchored in a narrow harbor; the French crews were not expecting an attack; and the main armament of Dunkerque and Strasbourg was grouped on their bows and could not immediately be brought to bear1.
The attack lasted ten minutes, during which time the battleship Bretagne was hit by the third British salvo. Her magazine exploded, causing the ship to sink at 6:09 PM with the loss of 977 of her crew1. The Dunkerque was hit by several 15-inch shells and badly damaged to the extent that she had to be beached on the west side of the harbor to prevent her sinking4. The Provence was also hit astern and had to be beached, along with the destroyer Mogador which had lost its stern14. The seaplane carrier Commandant Teste was relatively undamaged4.
The battlecruiser Strasbourg, three destroyers, and one gunboat managed to evade the British mines and escape from the port under attack from Swordfish bombers from Ark Royal3. As the French bombing had little effect, Somerville ordered his ships to pursue. However, after Hood had closed to 25 nautical miles from Strasbourg, Somerville called off the pursuit, concerned about being outnumbered by a potential combined French force from Algiers3. Strasbourg successfully reached Toulon on July 43.
Operation Catapult was not limited to the attack at Mers-el-Kébir. Simultaneous actions were taken against French vessels in other locations:
Along with French vessels in metropolitan ports, some had sailed to ports in Britain or to Alexandria in Egypt. On the night of July 3, British forces boarded French ships berthed in Plymouth and Portsmouth without warning. The submarine Surcouf, the largest in the world, had been at Plymouth for the previous month. The crew resisted a boarding party, resulting in the deaths of three Royal Navy personnel and one French sailor3. Other ships captured included the old battleships Paris and Courbet, the destroyers Le Triomphant and Léopard, eight torpedo boats, five submarines, and various lesser ships3.
The French squadron in Alexandria, including the battleship Lorraine, the heavy cruiser Suffren, and three modern light cruisers, was neutralized by local agreement. After delicate negotiations conducted by Admiral Andrew Cunningham, Admiral René-Emile Godfroy agreed on July 7 to disarm his fleet and stay in port until the end of the war3.
On July 6, British forces returned to Mers-el-Kébir in Operation Lever. At dawn, Swordfish aircraft from HMS Ark Royal scored several torpedo hits on the beached battleship Dunkerque, killing 154 French sailors and wounding 8. One torpedo hit the patrol boat Terre Neuve, detonating depth charges and killing 8 more; shock waves from this explosion further damaged Dunkerque3.
On July 7-8, British Swordfish torpedo bombers from carrier HMS Hermes attacked the French battleship Richelieu at Dakar, French West Africa. A torpedo hit caused a 40-foot hole, bringing her to the bottom of the shallow harbor (though she was refloated shortly after)2. At Casablanca, French Morocco, British motor torpedo boats attacked the battleship Jean Bart, causing damage2.
The human cost of the attack at Mers-el-Kébir was severe. According to most accounts, 1,297 French servicemen were killed in the bombardment3. The casualty breakdown included 977 sailors aboard the Bretagne, 210 aboard Dunkerque, 38 aboard Mogador, and others distributed among the remaining vessels3. British losses were limited to five aircraft shot down and two crewmen killed3.
The French reaction was one of shock and outrage. Vichy France severed diplomatic relations with the United Kingdom on July 8, 19403. Admiral Darlan ordered the French fleet to attack Royal Navy ships wherever possible, though this order was overruled the next day by Pétain and Foreign Minister Paul Baudouin, who noted that "the attack on our fleet is one thing, war is another"3.
Military retaliation consisted primarily of ineffective air raids on Gibraltar. On September 24, sixty Vichy French aircraft bombed Gibraltar, dropping 45 tons of bombs, followed by another 81 bombers dropping 60 tons that night3. Additional raids continued, though they caused relatively little damage. Naval engagements between British and French ships occurred sporadically in the following months, though both sides generally avoided major confrontations3.
The attack at Mers-el-Kébir had profound and far-reaching consequences that extended beyond the immediate military situation. From a strategic perspective, it prevented a significant portion of the French fleet from potentially falling into German hands, though at a tremendous cost in lives and diplomatic capital.
For Winston Churchill and the British government, the attack, despite its brutality, was deemed a strategic necessity. Churchill described it as "the most hateful decision, the most unnatural and painful in which I have ever been concerned"3. However, he believed it demonstrated British resolve to continue fighting despite France's capitulation.
The attack had a positive effect on British morale at a critical juncture when the nation stood alone against Nazi Germany. It also demonstrated to the world, particularly the United States, Britain's determination to fight on regardless of the cost3. Ambassadors in Mediterranean countries reported favorable reactions, and foreign opinion was generally supportive of Operation Catapult3.
Vice Admiral Somerville himself was deeply troubled by the orders he had been given, reportedly saying that it was "the biggest political blunder of modern times and will rouse the whole world against us... we all feel thoroughly ashamed"3. Nevertheless, most British naval officers recognized the strategic imperative behind the action, however distasteful they found it.
For the French, the attack was viewed as a betrayal by a former ally. The attack revived Anglophobia in France and was condemned as an attack on a neutral nation3. Many in the French Navy believed that their assurances were honorable and should have been sufficient to allay British fears3.
The attack significantly complicated the position of Charles de Gaulle and the Free French Forces, making it more difficult for them to gain support among French military personnel and colonial authorities. The events at Mers-el-Kébir were used effectively by both the Vichy regime and German propaganda to portray Britain as treacherous10.
Perhaps most significantly for the French perspective, when the Germans attempted to seize the French fleet at Toulon on November 27, 1942, as part of Operation Anton, the French Navy scuttled their ships rather than allow them to fall into German hands3. For many in the French Navy, this was final proof that there had never been a risk of their ships ending up in German hands and that the British action at Mers-el-Kébir had been unnecessary3.
Historical assessments of the attack at Mers-el-Kébir remain divided. Some historians view it as a necessary, if tragic, action that demonstrated British resolve at a critical moment in the war. David Brown wrote in 2004 that foreign opinion was generally favorable to Operation Catapult and that the demonstration of British determination had succeeded3. Colin Smith suggested in 2010 that the attack was "the first big triumph of Churchill's premiership"3.
However, other scholars have offered more critical assessments. George Melton argued in 2015 that much of the historiography represented a "Churchillian perspective" that ignored how the attack had been a "tactical failure"3. He contended that the attack was unnecessary because the French Navy had already pledged to scuttle its ships rather than see them fall into German or Italian hands, a promise they ultimately kept at Toulon in 19423.
Melton further argued that the results were counterproductive, as the attack prompted French ships that had been dispersed to remote bases in French North Africa, beyond Axis reach, to concentrate at Toulon where they were in greater danger of seizure3. The attack also united the French people in hostility to the British and cost Britain access to the French Empire3.
The official British Navy News magazine in 1990 described the attack as "one of the most distasteful acts the Royal Navy has ever had to perform"3, reflecting the ongoing ambivalence with which the operation is viewed even within British naval circles.
The attack at Mers-el-Kébir had significant implications for subsequent Allied operations involving Vichy-controlled territories. Operation Menace, an Anglo-Free French attempt to take control of Dakar in French West Africa in September 1940, failed in part because of French resentment over Mers-el-Kébir10.
The Governor of French West Africa, Pierre Boisson, rejected Free French demands for surrender, and Vichy forces fought back vigorously. After several days of fighting from September 23-25, 1940, resulting in damage to British ships and French vessels, the operation was cancelled by the British War Cabinet2.
This pattern repeated in other encounters with Vichy forces. What Charles de Gaulle and the British had hoped would be welcoming receptions by French colonial forces often turned into hostile confrontations, complicated by the lingering bitterness over Mers-el-Kébir10.
Conclusion
The British attack on the French fleet at Mers-el-Kébir represents one of the most morally complex decisions of World War II. It pitted strategic necessity against alliance loyalty, military imperatives against humanitarian concerns, and short-term security against long-term diplomatic relationships.
The 1,297 French sailors who died at Mers-el-Kébir became unwitting casualties of the larger geopolitical struggle, victims of circumstances created by France's defeat and Britain's desperate strategic position. Their sacrifice highlights the tragic dimensions of a conflict that forced former allies into deadly confrontation.
The attack remains controversial, viewed by some as a regrettable but necessary action in an existential struggle and by others as an avoidable tragedy that damaged Franco-British relations for generations. What remains clear is that Operation Catapult represents a pivotal moment when Britain demonstrated to both allies and enemies that it would take whatever measures it deemed necessary to prevent defeat, regardless of the moral cost or diplomatic consequences. In the darkest days of 1940, with Britain standing alone against Nazi Germany, such ruthless calculation may have been inevitable, but the human toll at Mers-el-Kébir ensures that this operation will forever remain a troubling episode in the history of World War II.
Citations:
- https://u3anunawading.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/MilitaryHistoryNews-17.pdf
- https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=96
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-K%C3%A9bir
- https://bmmhs.org/mers-el-kebir-sinking-the-french-fleet/
- https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/timeline/factfiles/nonflash/a1144973.shtml
- https://www.schooltube.com/mers-el-kebir-the-british-attack-on-french-ships-in-1940/
- https://navalhistoria.com/operation-catapult/
- https://www.naval-review.com/book-reviews/mers-el-kebir-1940-operation-catapult/
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/war-of-words/necessary-tragedy-the-british-bombardments-of-the-french-fleet-at-mers-elkebir/DE6822EAC41514477B6A8363FFB1EECB
- https://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/7or550/what_was_the_french_reaction_to_britain_sinking_a/
- https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-and-operations/world-war-ii/1942/operation-torch.html
- https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205185232
- https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/why-did-the-royal-navy-sink-the-french-fleet-in-world-war-ii/
- https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2022/august/force-h-mers-el-kebir
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuttling_of_the_French_fleet_at_Toulon
- https://www.royalmarineshistory.com/post/operation-catapult-attack-on-the-french-fleet-mers-el-k%C3%A9bir
- https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/6i4her/why_did_the_royal_navy_sink_the_french_fleet/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlhYs7lRA9A
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Croiseur_de_bataille_Strasbourg_03-07-1940.jpg?sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjj9fvasf6LAxX3sJUCHSy9OJIQ_B16BAgBEAI
- https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/operation-catapult-the-attack-on-mers-el-kebir/
- https://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-France-World-War-II/Aftermath-of-the-Battle-of-France
- https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryHistory/comments/sjk9dr/what_is_your_opinion_on_the_british_attack_on_the/
- https://www.shipwrecksandseadogs.com/the-royal-navys-ww2-assault-on-the-french-fleet/?redirect_from=podpage
- https://www.combinedops.com/mers%20el%20kabir.htm
- https://www.ospreypublishing.com/ca/mers-elk%C3%A9bir-1940-9781472859709/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szITrhU2AnE
- https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520313712-050/pdf?licenseType=restricted
- https://www.difp.ie/volume-6/1940/british-attack-on-french-fleet-at-mers-el-kebir/3220/
No comments:
Post a Comment