The rapid proliferation of satellites in Earth orbit has created an urgent need for regulatory frameworks, yet the current system remains a patchwork of voluntary guidelines, national licensing requirements, and international treaties rather than a unified global enforcement mechanism. As of May 2025, approximately 11,700 active satellites orbit Earth, with SpaceX's Starlink alone accounting for over 60% of them. Projections suggest the number could exceed 60,000 by 2030, making effective space traffic management increasingly critical.[1][2][3]
Astronomers have serious concerns about satellite constellations
International Legal Framework
The Outer Space Treaty (1967)
The foundational document of international space law is the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, commonly known as the Outer Space Treaty. This treaty establishes several key principles: outer space shall be free for exploration and use by all nations, no country may claim sovereignty over space or celestial bodies, and states bear international responsibility for national space activities whether conducted by governmental or non-governmental entities. Critically, it prohibits placing nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction in orbit.[4][5]
However, the treaty was formulated in an era of few space actors and limited capabilities, and it lacks proper consideration of traffic management and collision avoidance. States that launch space objects retain jurisdiction and control over them, and are liable for damages caused by their space objects to other parties.[6][5]
The Liability Convention (1972)
The Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects expands on the Outer Space Treaty's liability provisions. Under this convention, launching states are absolutely liable for damage caused by their space objects on Earth's surface or to aircraft, while liability for damage in space is based on fault. Claims must be brought by one state against another—individuals and corporations cannot file claims directly under the convention. The only claim ever filed under this convention followed the 1978 crash of the Soviet nuclear-powered satellite Kosmos 954 in Canada.[7][8]
The Registration Convention (1975)
This convention requires states to register space objects with the United Nations and maintain national registries. States must provide information including the launching state, a designator or registration number, launch date and location, basic orbital parameters, and the general function of the space object. This registry serves as the basis for identifying which state has jurisdiction over a satellite and who bears liability in case of damage.[9][10][11]
Frequency Coordination Through the ITU
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) manages a cooperative international coordination system for radio frequencies used by satellites, aimed at preventing interference between systems. This process operates on a "first-come, first-served" approach for spectrum allocation and involves:[12][13]
- Advance Publication Information (API) submitted years before launch
- Bilateral and multilateral coordination with potentially affected administrations
- Recording in the Master International Frequency Register for international recognition and protection[14][12]
A typical satellite network requiring coordination must complete agreements with over 50 administrations and 2,000 satellite networks within a seven-year regulatory window. While this system effectively manages radio spectrum, it does not address physical collision avoidance or orbital debris.[14]
Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines
The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) has developed Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines that define the critical orbital zone of low-Earth orbit as all orbits below 2,000 kilometers, limit objects released during normal operations, and traditionally set a 25-year deorbiting requirement after mission completion. These guidelines, while widely referenced, are voluntary and non-binding.[15][16][17]
The Guidelines for the Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space ask states to provide updated contact information, improve sharing of orbital data, provide debris monitoring information, and perform conjunction assessment during flight. The 2024 UN Summit of the Future committed to "discuss the establishment of new frameworks for space traffic, space debris and space resources" through COPUOS.[18][19]
IADC Guidelines
The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC), composed of major space agencies, has developed more detailed technical guidelines that many national regulations reference. National debris mitigation strategies must typically be based on these internationally recognized guidelines.[20][17]
National Regulatory Requirements
United States
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted comprehensive orbital debris mitigation rules for satellites licensed in the U.S. or foreign-licensed satellites seeking U.S. market access. In September 2022, the FCC shortened the post-mission disposal requirement from 25 years to just 5 years for LEO satellites, with enforcement beginning in September 2024. The FCC also requires:[21][22][23]
- Disclosure of debris mitigation measures prior to authorization
- Demonstration of maneuverability capabilities
- Plans for limiting release of persistent liquids in space
- A 0.99 disposal reliability goal for large satellites[24][25]
The Department of Commerce's Office of Space Commerce launched the Traffic Coordination System for Space (TraCSS) in September 2024. This system provides spaceflight safety services including conjunction data messages that warn satellite operators of potential collisions. TraCSS is gradually taking over civil and commercial space situational awareness responsibilities from the Department of Defense.[26][27]
European Space Agency
ESA has adopted a Zero Debris approach with updated Space Debris Mitigation Policy and Requirements that came into effect in November 2023. Key provisions include:[28][29]
- Reducing the disposal phase duration from 25 to maximum 5 years
- Requiring disposal success probability greater than 90%
- Mandating interfaces to facilitate active debris removal if satellites fail in orbit
- Introducing collision avoidance and space traffic coordination requirements[28]
The Zero Debris Charter, facilitated by ESA in 2023, has been signed by 19 countries and over 150 commercial and non-commercial entities.[30]
Canada and Other Nations
Canada's Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) requires NGSO satellite licensees to submit debris mitigation plans consistent with IADC guidelines. Current proposals would require satellites in LEO to deorbit within 5 years following end of operational life and mandate active propulsion technology for satellites operating above 400 km altitude.[20][31]
Australia requires debris mitigation strategies based on internationally recognized guidelines as part of its Space (Launches and Returns) Act 2018. New Zealand has developed specific operational policies for active debris removal and on-orbit servicing missions.[17][32]
The Challenge of Mega-Constellations
The rise of mega-constellations presents unprecedented regulatory challenges. SpaceX's Starlink, with approximately 7,000-7,500 active satellites as of 2025, reports an average of one collision avoidance maneuver every two minutes within their constellation. The company plans up to 42,000 satellites with 5-year operating lifetimes.[33][2]
Space Debris
While mega-constellation operators often set voluntary targets exceeding regulatory minimums—such as deorbiting satellites within 3 years with 95% success rates—relying on self-imposed standards is considered unrealistic by many experts because there are no consequences for deviating from them. Atmospheric reentry of these satellites also raises environmental concerns: by 2023, 10% of stratospheric aerosols already included metals from rocket and satellite reentries, with projections suggesting metal vapor entering the atmosphere could exceed natural infall rates by 25 times or more.[16][33]
Space Sustainability Initiatives
Space Sustainability Rating (SSR)
The Space Sustainability Rating, developed by the World Economic Forum, ESA, MIT Media Lab, and EPFL, provides voluntary ratings for satellite missions based on debris mitigation, collision avoidance capabilities, data sharing, and alignment with international guidelines. Missions receive Bronze, Silver, Gold, or Platinum ratings based on their combined score across multiple sustainability modules.[34][35][36]
UK Standards Development
In May 2025, the UK's BSI launched two new space sustainability standards for public consultation with backing from the UK Space Agency. These standards address space debris, dark and quiet skies, and launch sustainability across the full mission lifecycle.[37]
The Kessler Syndrome Risk
Scientists warn of Kessler Syndrome—a cascade scenario where collisions produce debris that causes more collisions, potentially rendering LEO unusable for decades to centuries. Economic models estimate an aggregate threshold of approximately 72,000 satellites to prevent this scenario, though researchers emphasize this figure is a first approximation. Current estimates suggest roughly a 10% chance per year of a major collision, with experts debating whether the tipping point is 5, 10, or 20 years away.[33][38][39]
Light Pollution and Astronomy
Mega-constellations have significantly impacted astronomical observation. Research indicates the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory may need to discard 40% of its images due to satellite trails. Studies show that one-third of Hubble Space Telescope images will be contaminated if planned constellations are completed. The International Astronomical Union has called for satellites not to exceed a brightness magnitude of 7 (invisible to the naked eye), though current regulations do not mandate this. Unlike radio astronomy, which benefits from ITU protections, optical astronomy currently has no regulatory recourse against satellite light pollution.[40][41][42][43]
Regulatory Gaps and Future Directions
The current regulatory landscape has significant gaps:
- No binding international standards for collision avoidance or traffic management[15]
- No established governance framework for resolving potential conflicts and collisions[15]
- Most operators rely on freely accessible data from U.S. Space Command's Space-Track.org for collision avoidance[15]
- Large constellations have established agreements with NASA, but there is no national or global standard governing these activities[15]
Proposed solutions include establishing an International Space Traffic Management Organization, requiring launches from specific altitudes based on maneuverability capabilities, making states with launch capabilities into gatekeepers who prevent launches unless debris mitigation requirements are met, and developing coordinated systems for data sharing among all space operators.[6][16][15]
The space community increasingly recognizes that voluntary guidelines alone are insufficient for ensuring long-term orbital sustainability. As one expert noted, current practices in LEO threaten both the planet and humanity's ability to explore beyond it without far-reaching international regulation or significant self-imposed limits from satellite companies.[33]
⁂
- https://ts2.tech/en/mind-blowing-nearly-15000-satellites-are-whizzing-around-earth-right-now-find-out-why-it-matters/
- https://www.livescience.com/how-many-satellites-orbit-earth
- https://www.livescience.com/space/space-exploration/how-many-satellites-could-fit-in-earth-orbit-and-how-many-do-we-really-need
- https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/outer-space-treaty-glance
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty
- https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/space-traffic-management-time-for-action/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Liability_Convention
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/liability-convention.html
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/registration-convention.html
- https://www.itu.int/hub/2025/10/critical-registrations-along-the-satellite-lifecycle/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registration_Convention
- https://www.itu.int/hub/2023/11/frequency-coordination-for-satellite-radio-services-in-s-x-and-ka-bands/
- https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgrounders/Pages/Regulation-of-Satellite-Systems.aspx
- http://www.satmen.com/index.php/itu-satellite-network-frequency-coordination
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468896725000242
- https://www.theregreview.org/2025/10/07/conrad-orbital-debris-mitigation-guidelines/
- https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/spacelaw/sd/Space_Debris_Compendium_COPUOS_09_April_2024.pdf
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/space-new-wild-west-need-strengthened-space-traffic-management
- https://ploughshares.ca/how-summit-of-the-future-2024-dealt-with-outer-space-governance/
- https://cba.org/sections/air-and-space-law/resources/essaywinnerair2025/
- https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5782&context=smallsat
- https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/copuos/lsc/2024/TechnicalPresentations/April_18_Afternoon/1_--06-USA_Technical_Presentation_PPT_Slides.pdf
- https://vienna.usmission.gov/u-s-statement-agenda-item-10-63rd-session-of-the-copuos-lsc-april-2024/
- https://www.executivegov.com/articles/fcc-takes-action-to-address-orbital-debris-risks-with-order-on-reconsideration
- https://www.globalpolicywatch.com/2024/05/fccs-space-bureau-seeks-further-input-on-regulation-of-orbital-debris-comments-due-june-27/
- https://space.commerce.gov/commerce-departments-new-traffic-coordination-system-for-space-launches-initial-capabilities/
- https://space.commerce.gov/traffic-coordination-system-for-space-tracss/
- http://esoc.esa.int/new-space-debris-mitigation-policy-and-requirements-effect
- https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Mitigating_space_debris_generation
- https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/ESA_Space_Environment_Report_2025
- https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectrum-management-telecommunications/en/learn-more/key-documents/consultations/consultation-changes-licensing-requirements-and-conditions-licence-space-debris-mitigation
- https://www.mbie.govt.nz/dmsdocument/26611-active-debris-removal-and-on-orbit-servicing-operational-policy-pdf
- https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy/what-goes-up-must-come-down-how-megaconstellations-like-spacexs-starlink-network-pose-a-grave-safety-threat-to-us-on-earth-opinion
- https://spacesustainabilityrating.org/the-rating/
- https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Space_sustainability_rating_to_shine_light_on_debris_problem
- https://www.weforum.org/projects/space-sustainability-rating/
- https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/insights-and-media/media-centre/press-releases/2025/may/bsi-launches-two-new-space-sustainability-standards-for-consultation/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
- https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/features/understanding-the-misunderstood-kessler-syndrome/
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09759-5
- https://www.space.com/light-pollution-serious-threat-astronomy-skywatching
- https://csps.aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/Koller-Thompson_LightPollution_20201026.pdf
- https://legal-planet.org/2025/10/13/what-is-space-law/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_traffic_management
- https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/copuos/stsc/2022/40_ITU_-_First_Come_First_Served_Concept_to_Access_spectrum-orbit.pdf
- https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/space/WRS16space/ART-9.pdf
- https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4087&context=jalc
- https://itso.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Day-1-ITU-4-Coodination-and-notification-Procedure.pdf
- https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2025/aac_105c_22025crp/aac_105c_22025crp_23_0_html/AC105_C2_2025_CRP23E.pdf
- https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2025/aac_105c_12025crp/aac_105c_12025crp_9_0_html/AC105_C1_2025_CRP09E.pdf
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/projects/space-policy/publications/A-Brief-History-of-Space-Traffic-Management
- https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?httpsredir=1&article=1152&context=fac_pub
- https://nss.org/government-regulation-and-the-environmental-impact-of-satellite-constellations/
- https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/tos/tos.html
- https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc4/paper/39/SDC4-paper39.pdf
- https://administrativelawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/02/11.-ALR-72.4_Hearey_FINAL-Comment-2.pdf
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introouterspacetreaty.html
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265964624000651
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/outerspacetreaty.html
- https://space.commerce.gov/rfi-on-remote-sensing-satellite-disposal-requirements/
- https://www.ocbar.org/All-News/News-View/ArticleId/6869/December-2025-Cover-Story-Who-Pays-When-You-Get-Hit-by-Space-Debris
- https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm
- https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/08/09/2024-17093/space-innovation-mitigation-of-orbital-debris-in-the-new-space-age
- https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/Conv_Regi_Objects_Launched.pdf
- https://planet4589.org/space/papers/JJM2018/JJM_published.pdf
- https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/et0206
- https://academic.oup.com/book/56493/chapter/452649343
- https://spacesustainabilityrating.org
- https://docs.un.org/en/A/62/20(supp)
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576525001900
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/de/ourwork/topics/space-debris/compendium.html
- https://www.un.org/en/peace-and-security/international-space-law-explained
- https://www.abiresearch.com/press/over-480-orbital-launches-and-43000-active-satellites-expected-by-2032
- https://www.reddit.com/r/SpaceXLounge/comments/z1h4s6/just_how_close_are_we_to_kessler_syndrome/
- https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230002885/downloads/Servicing and ADR data codifications (Final)_.pdf
- https://www.pixalytics.com/satellites-in-space-2025/
- https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/space-technologies/articles/10.3389/frspt.2023.1309940/full
- https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item:4082466/view
- https://www.statista.com/statistics/1367699/number-of-satellites-in-orbit-by-country/
- https://www.soa.org/49f0ba/globalassets/assets/files/static-pages/research/arch/2023/arch-2023-2-kessym.pdf
- https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Active_debris_removal
- https://www.georgetownspace.org/contentmaster/active-debris-removal-its-complicated
- https://amplyfi.com/blog/understanding-the-space-debris-dilemma-the-kessler-syndrome/
- https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/copuos/stsc/2025/ListOfTechnicalPresentations/2_Tuesday4th/AM1_-_JAPAN_Item5_Global_implementation_of_active_debris_removal_Nobu_Okada_as_of_2_Feb.pdf
- https://nanoavionics.com/blog/how-many-satellites-are-in-space/
- https://www.jsr.org/hs/index.php/path/article/view/4013
- https://www.space.commerce.gov/wp-content/uploads/Lets-Talk-Space-Traffic-Coordination-Office-of-Space-Commerce-July-2024.pdf
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introliability-convention.html
- https://www.guiceoffshore.com/meet-tracss-the-new-space-traffic-coordination-system/
- https://illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Rage-Against-the-Dying-of-the-Light.pdf
- https://space.commerce.gov/2024/09/
- https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/Conv_International_Liab_Damage.pdf
- https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2024/aac_105c_22024crp/aac_105c_22024crp_28_0_html/AC105_C2_2024_CRP28E.pdf
- https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?httpsredir=1&article=1112&context=ilj
- https://darksky.org/resources/guides-and-how-tos/lighting-principles/
- https://space.commerce.gov/2024/
- https://cjil.uchicago.edu/print-archive/closing-liability-loophole-liability-convention-and-future-conflict-space
- https://iauoutreach.org/global-projects/dark-and-quiet-skies
- https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/psa/activities/2024/UN-IAF/Presentation/SatAM/S2-1_DalBello.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment