Friday, October 23, 2026

What is the latest on the Sunterra Markets situation in Alberta?



The latest development is that Sunterra’s Red Deer Bower Place market closed on September 26, 2026, leaving the company with five Calgary markets and one Edmonton market while the broader Sunterra group remains in court-supervised restructuring and a sale/investment process.[1][2]

Current situation

  • Sunterra has been operating under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) since 2025, giving it protection from creditors while it restructures.[3][4]
  • In April 2026, the Alberta Court of King’s Bench approved a sale and investment solicitation process for much of the Sunterra portfolio, including its Alberta agriculture, meat-processing, and grocery operations. KPMG Corporate Finance is the sales adviser and FTI Consulting is the court-appointed monitor.[2][1]
  • The first phase received confidential, non-binding letters of intent; the next stage is assessing those submissions and seeking binding bids. A recapitalization by the Price family remains one possible outcome.[1][3]

Store closures

Location

Status

Downtown Edmonton, Commerce Place

Closed May 29, 2026, after more than 30 years. [5]

Red Deer, Bower Place

Closed September 26, 2026, after five years. [1][2]

Calgary

Five markets reported still operating. [1][2]

Edmonton, Lendrum

Reported still operating, along with catering services. [5][1]


Why it happened

In January 2026, Justice Michael Lema found that Sunterra’s Canadian and U.S. entities engaged in large-scale cheque kiting and held the company liable to U.S. lender Compeer Financial for about US$35 million. The court also found president Ray Price personally responsible.[6][3]

Sunterra sought leave to appeal, but the Alberta Court of Appeal denied that request in April 2026, leaving the lower-court ruling in place.[7]

What to watch

The key question is whether the CCAA process produces a buyer, investor, refinancing, or Price-family recapitalization that keeps some or all of the remaining Sunterra businesses operating. No announced sale or rescue transaction appears to have been completed as of the latest reporting.[3][1]

⁂


What is the latest status of the sales process

The sales process has completed Phase 1, but there is no publicly announced successful buyer, binding offer, or court-approved sale transaction as of the latest available reporting. The process remains at the stage where qualified Phase 1 bidders would be invited to make binding offers in Phase 2.[11][12][13]

Where the process stands

  • On April 28, 2026, the Alberta Court of King’s Bench approved Sunterra’s court-supervised Sale and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP), covering a sale of, or investment in, all or substantially all of the Sunterra Group’s business and assets. KPMG Corporate Finance is the sale adviser; FTI Consulting is the court-appointed monitor.[13][14]
  • Phase 1 required interested parties to submit non-binding letters of intent by 5:00 p.m. Calgary time on June 25, 2026.[12][14]
  • Reporting in early August said that first phase had concluded and that the parties were reviewing the confidential, non-binding expressions of interest before moving toward binding bids.[15][11]

Phase 2 status

  • Under the approved SISP, only parties qualified in Phase 1 may proceed to Phase 2, where they can submit a binding offer to buy all, substantially all, or part of the business/assets—or to invest in, restructure, recapitalize, or refinance Sunterra.[12][13]
  • The Phase 2 deadline was deliberately left flexible: it is to be set by the sale adviser, chief restructuring adviser, and monitor after assessing Phase 1 interest.[16][13]
  • Any successful bid still requires court approval before it can be implemented.[13][12]

What has not happened

There is no public evidence that Sunterra has named a stalking-horse bidder, announced a definitive purchase agreement, or obtained court approval for a sale. The company’s CCAA stay was extended to October 30, 2026, so the restructuring and sale process is still active.[16]

In practical terms: Phase 1 is done; Phase 2 binding bids are the next milestone, but their deadline and the identities or number of bidders have not been publicly disclosed.[11][12][16]

⁂


  • https://retail-insider.com/retail-insider/2026/09/sunterra-closes-another-of-its-market-locations/       
  • https://todayinbc.com/2026/09/26/red-deer-sunterra-market-closes/    
  • https://www.cbc.ca/lite/story/9.7296199    
  • https://rdnewsnow.com/2025/04/03/sunterra-quality-food-markets-inc-files-for-bankruptcy-protection/ 
  • https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/downtown-grocer-closes-after-3-decades-amid-series-of-legal-financial-troubles/  
  • https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/sunterra-lawsuit-appeal-michael-lema-9.7114808 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/lite/story/9.7176610 
  • https://x.com/RetailInsider_/status/2085132699937956246 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/sunterra-compeer-financial-sale-9.7296199 
  • https://albertawestnews.blogspot.com/2026/08/latest-on-sunterra-markets.html 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/lite/story/9.7296199   
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/2501-06120-Filed-2026-05-07-SISP-Approval-Order.pdf     
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/(20260428)250106120FILED20260422APPLICATION.pdf     
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/Sunterra SISP Notice.pdf  
  • https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mariotoneguzzi_sunterra-market-ends-first-phase-of-sale-activity-7492151192014462976-MXE6 
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/(2026-04-28) -2501-06120 -Filed-2026-04-27-Monitor's-Seventh-Report.pdf   
  • https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mariotoneguzzi_sunterra-market-ends-first-phase-of-sale-activity-7490898240981069824-8UjD 
  • https://harrispartnersadvisory.ca/sunterra 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/sunterra-compeer-financial-sale-9.7296199 
  • https://retail-insider.com/retail-insider/2026/09/sunterra-closes-another-of-its-market-locations/ 
  • https://todayinbc.com/2026/09/26/red-deer-sunterra-market-closes/ 
  • https://x.com/RetailInsider_/status/2085132699937956246 
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/2501-06120-Filed-2026-02-23-Report-of-the-Monitor.pdf 
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/Sunterra - Monitors Fourth Report - Final.pdf 
  • https://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/sunterra/docs/2501-06120-Filed-2025-12-09-Report-of-the-Monitor.pdf 

Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Referendum results for the Sundre/Rocky Mountain House/Rimbey riding

In the Rimbey–Rocky Mountain House–Sundre riding, preliminary results narrowly favoured starting the legal process toward a binding separation referendum—unlike the province as a whole, which strongly chose to remain in Canada.[1][2]

Question 10: separation

Option

Preliminary votes

Share

Option 2 — begin legal process toward binding separation referendum

12,775

51.1%

Option 1 — Alberta remains a province of Canada

12,239

48.9%

Margin

536 votes

2.1 percentage points


These are unofficial preliminary counts; Elections Alberta is expected to release official results next week.[3][4]

Other questions

The riding voted Yes at a higher rate than Alberta overall on all nine other referendum questions. The strongest local support was for Question 5, requiring proof of citizenship in provincial elections, at nearly 85% Yes.[3]

Question

Local Yes share

1 — Increased provincial control over immigration

76.1%

2 — Eligibility rules for provincially funded programs

73.3%

5 — Proof of citizenship in provincial elections

~85%

6 — Provincial selection of certain court justices

81.4%


Important caveat

The result was still very close and potentially sensitive to outstanding mail-in/special ballots: one report noted that, where mail-in ballots had been counted, they favoured “no” on Question 1 by 197 votes, while the riding-wide separation vote stood at 50.4% with nearly 93% of voting locations reporting.[5]

So the best current answer is: Rimbey–Rocky Mountain House–Sundre preliminarily backed the separation-referendum process by about 51.1% to 48.9%, but the official result had not yet been certified.[2][3]

⁂


  • https://www.cbc.ca/9.7389488 
  • https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/alberta-referendum/article/theyre-being-left-behind-why-this-alberta-riding-backed-another-referendum/  
  • https://945rewindradio.ca/2026/10/20/referendum-results-rimbey-rocky-mountain-house-sundre/   
  • https://alberta.io/election/results 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/livestory/alberta-referendum-results-live-updates-separatism-october-19-2026-9.7387777?id=9.7387777.17028 
  • https://www.stalbertgazette.com/beyond-local/only-two-alberta-ridings-show-majority-support-for-separation-referendum-process-12914853 
  • https://www.cochraneeagle.ca/beyond-local/sundre-riding-overtakes-central-peace-notley-in-support-for-separation-referendum-process-12919137 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/2026-alberta-referendum-results-9.7389488 
  • https://rdnewsnow.com/2026/10/20/central-alberta-voting-results-on-separation-a-mixed-bag/ 
  • https://ca.news.yahoo.com/alberta-referendum-voters-answered-10-194819710.html 
  • https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/livestory/alberta-referendum-results-live-updates-separatism-october-19-2026-9.7387777?id=9.7387777.17035 
  • https://ca.news.yahoo.com/live-alberta-referendum-voters-choose-055853313.html 
  • https://centralalbertaonline.com/articles/2026-referendum-results-rimbey-rocky-mountain-house-sundre 
  • https://ca.news.yahoo.com/few-rural-alberta-ridings-see-204953831.html 

Monday, October 19, 2026

Latest on Photon Computing

 

Message from Charles Aulds


My psychiatrist told me I'm going crazy. I told him, "If you don't

mind I'd like a second opinion!"

He said, "Alright ... you're ugly too."

— Rodney Dangerfield

Sunday, October 18, 2026

Musings on "Reality"

Editor: It seems to me that our collective notion of “reality“ is a cultural construct rather than some immutable truth

AI: You’re pointing at something important, but the strongest version is more precise: our shared interpretation of reality is largely culturally constructed, while reality itself is not thereby made arbitrary. Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s classic account argues that social groups create shared meanings through repeated interaction, then experience those meanings as objective facts.

What culture constructs

Culture shapes much of what feels self-evident:

  • Categories such as money, citizenship, marriage, race, property, status, and “normal” behavior.
  • Moral judgments about honor, sexuality, work, violence, and obligation.
  • Perceptual habits: what counts as polite, dangerous, beautiful, sacred, or rational.
  • Institutional routines: schooling, law, bureaucracy, and the division of labor.

Berger and Luckmann describe this as a cycle: people externalize meanings through action, those meanings become objectified as institutions and norms, and new members internalize them through socialization—so they come to feel like independent reality.

What culture does not construct

A useful distinction is between ontology (what exists) and social meaning (what things mean and how we organize them).

Example

Culturally constructed

Not culturally constructed

Money

Its value, legitimacy, and rules

The physical token, ledger entry, or exchange act

A river

Whether it is sacred, navigable, ownable, or polluted

Its flow, sediment load, and hydrology

Illness

Stigma, diagnosis categories, treatment norms

Biological processes and physical suffering

Time

Calendars, workweeks, punctuality

Recurrent physical processes and causal sequence


So saying “reality is a cultural construct” can be true for the social world, but overextends if it denies an independent world that constrains us. A community can redefine a floodplain as developable land, but water will still behave according to hydrology.

The middle position

A defensible view is critical realism or “social constructionism with constraints”:

  • There is a mind-independent world.
  • Our access to it is mediated by bodies, language, instruments, and culture.
  • Some entities—money, nations, legal persons—exist because collective agreement sustains them.
  • Other entities—gravity, pathogens, aquifers, climate systems—exist independently, though our concepts and responses to them are socially shaped.

That last point matters for your interests: an aquifer is not merely a cultural idea, but whether people treat it as a commons, a commodity, a sacred resource, or infrastructure is deeply cultural.

Why it feels immutable

Constructed realities become durable because they are repeated, taught, enforced, and embedded in institutions. Once people organize their lives around them—paying taxes, obeying borders, using money, following professional roles—the construct acquires real causal power. Berger and Luckmann call this the dialectic between subjective and objective reality: society shapes individuals, while individuals continuously reproduce or modify society.

So the sharpest formulation might be: “Reality” as a shared human framework is culturally constructed; the world that framework tries to describe is not wholly up for construction.

⁂